Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (32eeae)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Training-data provenance questionnaire arrived with a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' for HR analytics governance lead. That is a AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems decision on a shadow system must in a manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools.
Decision
HR analytics governance lead in a manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using training-data provenance questionnaire after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'.
Hypotheses to test
- The population in training-data provenance questionnaire is the one a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Vendors and Agentic Systems file.
- The population in training-data provenance questionnaire is adjacent only to a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'; Model defect is the honest AI Governance call.
- A manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools already contained a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' before training-data provenance questionnaire arrived; no new Vendors and Agentic Systems path.
- Provenance on training-data provenance questionnaire after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.
Analysis required
- Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate HR analytics governance lead can actually point to.
- Walk the model input/output path recorded in training-data provenance questionnaire and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
- Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate HR analytics governance lead can actually point to.
- For this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file, read training-data provenance questionnaire against a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' and write the one fact that would move a shadow system must for HR analytics governance lead.
Recommendation
Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems packet (training-data provenance questionnaire after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'). The follow-on Vendors and Agentic Systems action is what HR analytics governance lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (febdc9)
- Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (7bb727)
- Assess whether the board has been accurately briefed (0628ee)
- Assess whether the vendor can be used in a regulated process (3b6207)
- Assess whether a generative-AI incident is a policy breach or a model defect
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

