Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (fb1611)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
After an examiner request for the current model inventory, training-data provenance questionnaire is what EU AI Act implementation manager can touch in an insurer scoring claims with a third-party model. AI Governance will live with Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this Policy and Oversight file.
Decision
EU AI Act implementation manager in an insurer scoring claims with a third-party model must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using training-data provenance questionnaire after an examiner request for the current model inventory.
Hypotheses to test
- EU AI Act implementation manager can defend Policy or governance breach from training-data provenance questionnaire after an examiner request for the current model inventory in a AI Governance challenge.
- EU AI Act implementation manager cannot defend Policy or governance breach from training-data provenance questionnaire; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after an examiner request for the current model inventory.
- An examiner request for the current model inventory never reached the population in training-data provenance questionnaire — reopen intake, do not close a shadow system must.
- Two facts in training-data provenance questionnaire after an examiner request for the current model inventory conflict for EU AI Act implementation manager; hold this Policy and Oversight file.
Analysis required
- Reproduce the incident row in training-data provenance questionnaire and say whether it ever touched production data.
- Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in training-data provenance questionnaire.
- Reproduce the incident row in training-data provenance questionnaire and say whether it ever touched production data.
- For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read training-data provenance questionnaire against an examiner request for the current model inventory and write the one fact that would move a shadow system must for EU AI Act implementation manager.
Recommendation
Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (training-data provenance questionnaire after an examiner request for the current model inventory). The follow-on Policy and Oversight action is what EU AI Act implementation manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Assess whether human review is real or a rubber stamp (2c8852)
- Assess whether the board has been accurately briefed (7c8635)
- Assess whether an agent may take actions without a human gate (addf1b)
- Assess whether a generative-AI incident is a policy breach or a model defect
- Assess whether deprecation of a legacy scorecard creates a governance gap
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

