Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (9102b3)

Situation

A city using a hiring-screen algorithm cannot treat a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' as color commentary on EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet. Vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools must close a shadow system must from that extract under AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems.

Decision

Vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'.

Hypotheses to test

• EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet reads as Policy or governance breach once a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' is lined up to the same AI Governance population.
• EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is closer to Model defect after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Vendors and Agentic Systems extract.
• Dual failure is still live in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm.
• EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is missing the fact vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools needs after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'; stop this AI Governance close.

Analysis required

• Reproduce the incident row in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and say whether it ever touched production data.
• Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.
• Reproduce the incident row in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and say whether it ever touched production data.
• For this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable' and write the one fact that would move a shadow system must for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems packet (EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a board deck that called the system 'fully explainable'). The follow-on Vendors and Agentic Systems action is what vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.