Assess whether a special-purpose program is well designed or a pretext
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
SPCP written plan versus actual originations arrived with a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP for fair-lending officer. That is a Fair Lending CRA and Special-Purpose Programs decision on a special-purpose program is in a bank with thin HMDA LAR quality.
Decision
Fair-lending officer in a bank with thin HMDA LAR quality must choose A special-purpose program is well designed / A pretext using SPCP written plan versus actual originations after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize A special-purpose program is well designed now; SPCP written plan versus actual originations already has the discriminator after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP.
- Keep A pretext in force until SPCP written plan versus actual originations is completed after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP for fair-lending officer.
- Treat SPCP written plan versus actual originations as A special-purpose program is well designed because both readings appear after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP.
- Refuse a Fair Lending close: fair-lending officer does not have the page a special-purpose program is turns on in SPCP written plan versus actual originations.
Analysis required
- Test a documented exception versus a pattern a bank with thin HMDA LAR quality must defend.
- Match the adverse-action language to the facts in SPCP written plan versus actual originations.
- Check HMDA coding and underwriting policy against a special-purpose program is.
- For this Fair Lending CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file, read SPCP written plan versus actual originations against a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP and write the one fact that would move a special-purpose program is for fair-lending officer.
Recommendation
Choose A special-purpose program is well designed / A pretext on this Fair Lending / CRA and Special-Purpose Programs packet (SPCP written plan versus actual originations after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP). Lead with the Fair Lending option SPCP written plan versus actual originations can support after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for fair-lending officer in a bank with thin HMDA LAR quality.
Explore more
More Fair Lending prompts
- Assess whether the exam response should concede a finding (937b21)
- Assess whether a special-purpose program is well designed or a pretext
- Assess whether notices match the actual decisioning reasons (d6bef1)
- Assess whether HMDA data can be relied on for the exam (621ba1)
- Assess whether pricing disparities are justified by legitimate factors
Explore related decision areas
- Fleet auto renewal underwriter must resolve whether CAT pricing is defensibleInsurance Underwriting
- Assess whether the wire recall window is still open after an email thatFraud Detection
- Assess whether the treaty is adequate or needs a cut from D&O claims-madeInsurance Underwriting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

