Whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act from EU AI Act high-risk

Situation

In a retailer using generative AI in customer service, EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is the evidence after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose. Vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools has to pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit close using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.

Decision

Vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools in a retailer using generative AI in customer service must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize Policy or governance breach now; EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet already has the discriminator after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.
• Keep Model defect in force until EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is completed after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools.
• Treat EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet as Dual failure because both readings appear after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.
• Refuse a AI Governance close: vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools does not have the page the system is high-risk turns on in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.

Analysis required

• Walk the model input/output path recorded in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
• Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools can actually point to.
• Walk the model input/output path recorded in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
• For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit packet (EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose). Lead with the AI Governance option EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet can support after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools in a retailer using generative AI in customer service.

Command returns

• Bottom-line AI Governance option on the system is high-risk, then the evidence in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet, then the action for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools
• Hypothesis scorecard against EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet: supported / rejected / untestable
• What changes the system is high-risk if a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose is later withdrawn
• Named option among Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure and the fact that kills the others