Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (b2f3e3)

SITUATION The working file is generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed. Model-risk officer in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model has to name Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Bias and Training Data file.

DECISION Model-risk officer in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft already has the discriminator after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed. 2. Keep Model defect in force until generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft is completed after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed for model-risk officer. 3. Treat generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft as Dual failure because both readings appear after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed. 4. Refuse a AI Governance close: model-risk officer does not have the decision the system is high-risk turns on in generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft. 2. Reproduce the incident row in generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft and say whether it ever touched production data. 3. Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft. 4. For this AI Governance Bias and Training Data file, read generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft against a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for model-risk officer.

RECOMMENDATION Start from the open question on generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft: Authorize Policy or governance breach now; generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft already has the discriminator after a near-miss where an agent emailed a cu Then read generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed. Model-risk officer takes Policy or governance breach only if that extract answers it for this AI Governance Bias and Training Data case in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model; otherwise stay on Model defect.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the system is high-risk, then the evidence in generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft, then the action for model-risk officer - Hypothesis scorecard against generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for model-risk officer in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model