Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act after a new use
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
After a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose, incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo is what chief AI officer can touch in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam. AI Governance will live with Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this Inventory and Regulatory Fit file.
Decision
Chief AI officer in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Policy or governance breach now; incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo already has the discriminator after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.
- Keep Model defect in force until incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo is completed after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose for chief AI officer.
- Treat incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo as Dual failure because both readings appear after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.
- Refuse a AI Governance close: chief AI officer does not have the page the system is high-risk turns on in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo.
Analysis required
- Walk the model input/output path recorded in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
- Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate chief AI officer can actually point to.
- Walk the model input/output path recorded in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
- For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo against a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for chief AI officer.
Recommendation
Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit packet (incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose). Lead with the AI Governance option incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo can support after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for chief AI officer in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Whether the vendor can be used in a regulated process from incomplete model
- Whether the vendor can be used in a regulated process from explainability
- Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (e2e120)
- Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (0253dd)
- Assess whether human review is real or a rubber stamp from training-data
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

