Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (5a534c)
August 31, 2026
SITUATION A pharma company using LLMs on trial documents cannot treat a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region as incidental context on incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo. EU AI Act implementation manager must close the system is high-risk from that extract under AI Governance / Bias and Training Data.
DECISION EU AI Act implementation manager in a pharma company using LLMs on trial documents must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.
HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo is the one a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Bias and Training Data file. 2. The population in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo is adjacent only to a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region; Model defect is the honest AI Governance call. 3. A pharma company using LLMs on trial documents already contained a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region before incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo arrived; no new Bias and Training Data path. 4. Provenance on incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.
ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo. 2. Reproduce the incident row in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo and say whether it ever touched production data. 3. Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo. 4. For this AI Governance Bias and Training Data file, read incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo against a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for EU AI Act implementation manager.
RECOMMENDATION Treat this reading of incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo as the gate for the system is high-risk: Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in incident log. If incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region confirms that reading, EU AI Act implementation manager takes Policy or governance breach in a pharma company using LLMs on trial documents. If incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo contradicts it, take Model defect.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (f0ff0f)
- Assess whether deprecation of a legacy scorecard creates a governance gap
- Assess whether human review is real or a rubber stamp (2c4c38)
- Exam-readiness coordinator must resolve whether an agent may take actions
- Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (69e308)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

