Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (17d1fb)

SITUATION Post-deployment drift report the owner never signed arrived with an examiner request for the current model inventory for exam-readiness coordinator. That is a AI Governance Policy and Oversight decision on the system is high-risk in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model.

DECISION Exam-readiness coordinator in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after an examiner request for the current model inventory.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Exam-readiness coordinator owns the system is high-risk on post-deployment drift report the owner never signed: take Policy or governance breach when an examiner request for the current model inventory left a reconstructable Policy and Oversight trail in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model. 2. Take Model defect when post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after an examiner request for the current model inventory cannot reconstruct that Policy and Oversight trail. 3. Post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after an examiner request for the current model inventory is a cutoff or timing miss in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model, not Policy or governance breach. 4. Do not close the system is high-risk from post-deployment drift report the owner never signed while the AI Governance fact exam-readiness coordinator would cite is still absent.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate exam-readiness coordinator can actually point to. 2. Walk the model input/output path recorded in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 3. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate exam-readiness coordinator can actually point to. 4. For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read post-deployment drift report the owner never signed against an examiner request for the current model inventory and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for exam-readiness coordinator.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after an examiner request for the current model inventory). If post-deployment drift report the owner never signed cannot force a AI Governance label under Policy and Oversight, stop. Do not invent missing evidence a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model does not have.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the system is high-risk, then the evidence in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed, then the action for exam-readiness coordinator - Hypothesis scorecard against post-deployment drift report the owner never signed: supported / rejected / untestable - Policy and Oversight finding in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed that a second reviewer can re-perform - Missing page in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after an examiner request for the current model inventory, if any