Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (1554b7)

SITUATION Shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII arrived with a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal. Vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm still has an evidence gap on whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act.

DECISION Vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm must choose Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure, Hold for the missing fact using shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal. The question on that file is whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII already has the discriminator after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal. 2. Keep Model defect in force until shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII is completed after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools. 3. Treat shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII as Dual failure because both readings appear after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal. 4. Refuse a AI Governance close: vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools does not have the decision the system is high-risk turns on in shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Walk the model input/output path recorded in shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 2. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools can actually point to. 3. Walk the model input/output path recorded in shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file, read shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII against a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems packet (shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal). Lead with the AI Governance option shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII can support after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the system is high-risk, then the evidence in shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII, then the action for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools - Hypothesis scorecard against shadow-IT chatbot connected to customer PII: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes the system is high-risk if a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal is later withdrawn - Named option among Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure and the fact that kills the others