Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act from vendor model
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
The desk packet is vendor model card with missing evaluation slices after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region. HR analytics governance lead in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm has to name Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file.
Decision
HR analytics governance lead in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using vendor model card with missing evaluation slices after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Policy or governance breach now; vendor model card with missing evaluation slices already has the discriminator after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.
- Keep Model defect in force until vendor model card with missing evaluation slices is completed after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region for HR analytics governance lead.
- Treat vendor model card with missing evaluation slices as Dual failure because both readings appear after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.
- Refuse a AI Governance close: HR analytics governance lead does not have the page the system is high-risk turns on in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices.
Analysis required
- Walk the model input/output path recorded in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
- Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate HR analytics governance lead can actually point to.
- Walk the model input/output path recorded in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
- For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read vendor model card with missing evaluation slices against a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for HR analytics governance lead.
Recommendation
Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit packet (vendor model card with missing evaluation slices after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region). The follow-on Inventory and Regulatory Fit action is what HR analytics governance lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Assess whether the vendor can be used in a regulated process after a new use
- Assess whether a generative-AI incident is a policy breach or a model defect
- Does Training Data Have Lawful Basis and Documented Lineage?
- Whether the board has been accurately briefed from training-data provenance
- Vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools must resolve whether the system
Explore related decision areas
- Whether the committee can overrule a business unit from deprecation planAI Governance Layer
- Assess whether to pause a product pending a lookback (d40098)Fair Lending
- Assess whether audits can reconstruct who authorized what (23518d)AI Governance Layer
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

