Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (0428af)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
After a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy, vendor model card with missing evaluation slices is what model-risk officer can touch in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model. AI Governance will live with Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this Bias and Training Data file.
Decision
Model-risk officer in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using vendor model card with missing evaluation slices after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy.
Hypotheses to test
- Vendor model card with missing evaluation slices reads as Policy or governance breach once a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy is lined up to the same AI Governance population.
- Vendor model card with missing evaluation slices is closer to Model defect after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Bias and Training Data extract.
- Dual failure is still live in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices for model-risk officer in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model.
- Vendor model card with missing evaluation slices is missing the fact model-risk officer needs after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy; stop this AI Governance close.
Analysis required
- Reproduce the incident row in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices and say whether it ever touched production data.
- Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices.
- Reproduce the incident row in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices and say whether it ever touched production data.
- For this AI Governance Bias and Training Data file, read vendor model card with missing evaluation slices against a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for model-risk officer.
Recommendation
Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Bias and Training Data packet (vendor model card with missing evaluation slices after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy). The follow-on Bias and Training Data action is what model-risk officer does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (4b51db)
- Assess whether human review is real or a rubber stamp (660cf0)
- Assess whether human review is real or a rubber stamp (cd35fc)
- Assess whether human review is real or a rubber stamp (aaa789)
- Assess whether deprecation of a legacy scorecard creates a governance gap
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

