Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (337076)

SITUATION Exam-readiness coordinator in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model has one working extract — vendor model card with missing evaluation slices — after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty. If vendor model card with missing evaluation slices cannot support the system is high-risk, the only defensible AI Governance output is hold.

DECISION Exam-readiness coordinator in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using vendor model card with missing evaluation slices after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. An internal audit finding that human review logs are empty is noise around an already-controlled Policy and Oversight process in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model, given vendor model card with missing evaluation slices. 2. An internal audit finding that human review logs are empty is the event in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices that forces Policy or governance breach for exam-readiness coordinator under AI Governance. 3. Vendor model card with missing evaluation slices shows a one-file miss after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty, not a Policy and Oversight program failure. 4. Vendor model card with missing evaluation slices cannot decide the system is high-risk yet after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty; hold is the only AI Governance close a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate exam-readiness coordinator can actually point to. 2. Walk the model input/output path recorded in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 3. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate exam-readiness coordinator can actually point to. 4. For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read vendor model card with missing evaluation slices against an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for exam-readiness coordinator.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (vendor model card with missing evaluation slices after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty). The follow-on Policy and Oversight action is what exam-readiness coordinator does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the system is high-risk, then the evidence in vendor model card with missing evaluation slices, then the action for exam-readiness coordinator - Hypothesis scorecard against vendor model card with missing evaluation slices: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for exam-readiness coordinator in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model - What changes the system is high-risk if an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty is later withdrawn