Assess whether TDP is complete enough to compete the work after UCAs older

SITUATION Repair-vs-buy decision support lead owns this Depot Procurement Intelligence review in an engineering support activity reviewing alternate sources. UCAs older than the local policy cap is the triggering event; repair-history file that will not tie to cost is the evidence for whether TDP is complete enough to compete the work.

DECISION Repair-vs-buy decision support lead in an engineering support activity reviewing alternate sources must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using repair-history file that will not tie to cost after UCAs older than the local policy cap.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Repair-vs-buy decision support lead can defend Fund and move materiel from repair-history file that will not tie to cost after UCAs older than the local policy cap in a Defense Sustainment challenge. 2. Repair-vs-buy decision support lead cannot defend Fund and move materiel from repair-history file that will not tie to cost; Cannibalize or substitute is what the extract actually supports after UCAs older than the local policy cap. 3. UCAs older than the local policy cap never reached the population in repair-history file that will not tie to cost — reopen intake, do not close TDP is complete enough. 4. Two facts in repair-history file that will not tie to cost after UCAs older than the local policy cap conflict for repair-vs-buy decision support lead; hold this Depot Procurement Intelligence file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in repair-history file that will not tie to cost. 2. Quantify mission impact if TDP is complete enough is deferred one cycle in an engineering support activity reviewing alternate sources. 3. Reconcile depot demand in repair-history file that will not tie to cost to fleet readiness and NSN coverage after UCAs older than the local policy cap. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read repair-history file that will not tie to cost against UCAs older than the local policy cap and write the one fact that would move TDP is complete enough for repair-vs-buy decision support lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (repair-history file that will not tie to cost after UCAs older than the local policy cap). If repair-history file that will not tie to cost cannot force a Defense Sustainment label under Depot Procurement Intelligence, stop. Do not invent missing evidence an engineering support activity reviewing alternate sources does not have.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on TDP is complete enough, then the evidence in repair-history file that will not tie to cost, then the action for repair-vs-buy decision support lead - Hypothesis scorecard against repair-history file that will not tie to cost: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in repair-history file that will not tie to cost after UCAs older than the local policy cap, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Depot Procurement Intelligence would cite