Assess whether to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid (4ff75f)

SITUATION Proposal compliance lead in a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work has one working extract — discriminator table that still reads generic — after a key person who just resigned. If discriminator table that still reads generic cannot support to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid, the only defensible Government RFP output is hold.

DECISION Proposal compliance lead in a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work must choose To bid as prime, sub, / No-bid using discriminator table that still reads generic after a key person who just resigned.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Proposal compliance lead can defend To bid as prime, sub, from discriminator table that still reads generic after a key person who just resigned in a Government RFP challenge. 2. Proposal compliance lead cannot defend To bid as prime, sub, from discriminator table that still reads generic; No-bid is what the extract actually supports after a key person who just resigned. 3. A key person who just resigned never reached the population in discriminator table that still reads generic — reopen intake, do not close to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid. 4. Two facts in discriminator table that still reads generic after a key person who just resigned conflict for proposal compliance lead; hold this Performance and Teaming file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what discriminator table that still reads generic attaches. 2. Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid. 3. Score competitive posture if proposal compliance lead pursues, partners, or no-bids. 4. For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read discriminator table that still reads generic against a key person who just resigned and write the one fact that would move to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid for proposal compliance lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose To bid as prime, sub, / No-bid on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (discriminator table that still reads generic after a key person who just resigned). The follow-on Performance and Teaming action is what proposal compliance lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid, then the evidence in discriminator table that still reads generic, then the action for proposal compliance lead - Hypothesis scorecard against discriminator table that still reads generic: supported / rejected / untestable - Regulatory or exam hook Performance and Teaming would cite - Performance and Teaming finding in discriminator table that still reads generic that a second reviewer can re-perform