Assess whether to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid from discriminator table that

SITUATION After a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement, discriminator table that still reads generic is what contracts officer supporting a bid can touch in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft. Government RFP will live with To bid as prime, sub, versus No-bid on this Compliance and Cyber Requirements file.

DECISION Contracts officer supporting a bid in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft must choose To bid as prime, sub, / No-bid using discriminator table that still reads generic after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Discriminator table that still reads generic reads as To bid as prime, sub, once a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement is lined up to the same Government RFP population. 2. Discriminator table that still reads generic is closer to No-bid after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement; To bid as prime, sub, would over-claim this Compliance and Cyber Requirements extract. 3. A dual reading is still live in discriminator table that still reads generic for contracts officer supporting a bid in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft. 4. Discriminator table that still reads generic is missing the fact contracts officer supporting a bid needs after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement; stop this Government RFP close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft cannot waive quietly. 2. Map Section L/M requirements in discriminator table that still reads generic to evaluator notes after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement. 3. Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what discriminator table that still reads generic attaches. 4. For this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file, read discriminator table that still reads generic against a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement and write the one fact that would move to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid for contracts officer supporting a bid.

RECOMMENDATION Choose To bid as prime, sub, / No-bid on this Government RFP / Compliance and Cyber Requirements packet (discriminator table that still reads generic after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement). Lead with the Government RFP option discriminator table that still reads generic can support after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for contracts officer supporting a bid in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft.