Assess whether to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid (84bec6)

SITUATION Capture manager in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR has one working extract — past-performance recency and relevance scorecard — after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS. Capture manager in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR has past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS. If that extract cannot support to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid, the only defensible Government RFP Protest and Modifications output is hold.

DECISION Capture manager in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR must choose To bid as prime, sub, / No-bid using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is the one a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS named, so To bid as prime, sub, follows for this Protest and Modifications file. 2. The population in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is adjacent only to a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS; No-bid is the honest Government RFP call. 3. A lab competing a Phase II SBIR already contained a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS before past-performance recency and relevance scorecard arrived; no new Protest and Modifications path. 4. Provenance on past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS is broken; do not pick To bid as prime, sub, or No-bid yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score competitive posture if capture manager pursues, partners, or no-bids. 2. Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a lab competing a Phase II SBIR cannot waive quietly. 3. Map Section L/M requirements in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard to evaluator notes after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS. 4. For this Government RFP Protest and Modifications file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS and write the one fact that would move to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid for capture manager.

RECOMMENDATION Choose To bid as prime, sub, / No-bid on this Government RFP / Protest and Modifications packet (past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS). The follow-on Protest and Modifications action is what capture manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid, then the evidence in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard, then the action for capture manager - Hypothesis scorecard against past-performance recency and relevance scorecard: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among To bid as prime, sub,, No-bid and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for capture manager in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR