Whether to pause a product pending a lookback from SPCP written plan versus
August 31, 2026
SITUATION After a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time, SPCP written plan versus actual originations is what HMDA data-quality manager can touch in a lender expanding into majority-minority census tracts. Fair Lending will live with Remove access or reverse the item versus Temporary compensating control on this Pricing and Credit Limits file.
DECISION HMDA data-quality manager in a lender expanding into majority-minority census tracts must choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold using SPCP written plan versus actual originations after a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time.
HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. HMDA data-quality manager can defend Remove access or reverse the item from SPCP written plan versus actual originations after a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time in a Fair Lending challenge. 2. HMDA data-quality manager cannot defend Remove access or reverse the item from SPCP written plan versus actual originations; Temporary compensating control is what the extract actually supports after a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time. 3. A notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time never reached the population in SPCP written plan versus actual originations — reopen intake, do not close to pause a product. 4. Two facts in SPCP written plan versus actual originations after a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time conflict for HMDA data-quality manager; hold this Pricing and Credit Limits file.
ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Check HMDA coding and underwriting policy against to pause a product. 2. Compare SPCP written plan versus actual originations to similarly situated files, second-review notes, and reason codes after a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time. 3. Flag any disparate-impact table HMDA data-quality manager cannot explain from SPCP written plan versus actual originations. 4. For this Fair Lending Pricing and Credit Limits file, read SPCP written plan versus actual originations against a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time and write the one fact that would move to pause a product for HMDA data-quality manager.
RECOMMENDATION Choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold on this Fair Lending / Pricing and Credit Limits packet (SPCP written plan versus actual originations after a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time). Lead with the Fair Lending option SPCP written plan versus actual originations can support after a notice that cites 'other' as the principal reason 40% of the time, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for HMDA data-quality manager in a lender expanding into majority-minority census tracts.
Explore more
More Fair Lending prompts
- Assess whether a model update needs a fair-lending revalidation (3958f3)
- Assess whether a redlining pattern exists after controls after an underwriter
- Assess whether the exam response should concede a finding (a7ecde)
- Assess whether dealer overlays introduce prohibited steering (6ea5f6)
- Whether HMDA data can be relied on for the exam from adverse-action notice
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether a SAR narrative is supportable today (c0298e)Fraud Detection
- Assess whether CAT pricing is defensible given SOV quality (900b7e)Insurance Underwriting
- Assess whether human review is real or a rubber stamp (7c86d1)AI Governance
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

