Assess whether to quote, refer, or decline (530641)

SITUATION Workers'-compensation product manager in a cedent submitting a property treaty with thin bordereaux has one working extract — renewal large-loss narratives that contradict the application — after a CAT model version change that doubles AAL. If renewal large-loss narratives that contradict the application cannot support to quote, refer, or decline, the only defensible Insurance Underwriting output is hold.

DECISION Workers'-compensation product manager in a cedent submitting a property treaty with thin bordereaux must choose To quote, refer, / Decline using renewal large-loss narratives that contradict the application after a CAT model version change that doubles AAL.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize To quote, refer, now; renewal large-loss narratives that contradict the application already has the discriminator after a CAT model version change that doubles AAL. 2. Keep Decline in force until renewal large-loss narratives that contradict the application is completed after a CAT model version change that doubles AAL for workers'-compensation product manager. 3. Treat renewal large-loss narratives that contradict the application as To quote, refer, because both readings appear after a CAT model version change that doubles AAL. 4. Refuse a Insurance Underwriting close: workers'-compensation product manager does not have the decision to quote, refer, or decline turns on in renewal large-loss narratives that contradict the application.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Check the submission completeness against a CAT model version change that doubles AAL. 2. Say whether a cedent submitting a property treaty with thin bordereaux can bind, restrict, or decline from the file as it stands. 3. Test exposure, limits, and endorsement language in renewal large-loss narratives that contradict the application after a CAT model version change that doubles AAL. 4. For this Insurance Underwriting Treaty and Excess file, read renewal large-loss narratives that contradict the application against a CAT model version change that doubles AAL and write the one fact that would move to quote, refer, or decline for workers'-compensation product manager.

RECOMMENDATION Choose To quote, refer, / Decline on this Insurance Underwriting / Treaty and Excess packet (renewal large-loss narratives that contradict the application after a CAT model version change that doubles AAL). The follow-on Treaty and Excess action is what workers'-compensation product manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Insurance Underwriting option on to quote, refer, or decline, then the evidence in renewal large-loss narratives that contradict the application, then the action for workers'-compensation product manager - Hypothesis scorecard against renewal large-loss narratives that contradict the application: supported / rejected / untestable - Treaty and Excess finding in renewal large-loss narratives that contradict the application that a second reviewer can re-perform - Missing page in renewal large-loss narratives that contradict the application after a CAT model version change that doubles AAL, if any