Assess whether to report a refusal for shy bladder after an oral-fluid device

SITUATION Hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision arrived with an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff for oral-fluid implementation lead. That is a Forensic Drug Testing Specimen Validity decision on to report a refusal in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive.

DECISION Oral-fluid implementation lead in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive must choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold using hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. An oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff is noise around an already-controlled Specimen Validity process in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive, given hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision. 2. An oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff is the event in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision that forces Accept the result for oral-fluid implementation lead under Forensic Drug Testing. 3. Hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision shows a one-file miss after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff, not a Specimen Validity program failure. 4. Hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision cannot decide to report a refusal yet after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff; hold is the only Forensic Drug Testing close an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Walk chain of custody, collection site, and validity flags in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff. 2. Name the step oral-fluid implementation lead cannot reconstruct from hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision. 3. Test whether a broken seal, timing miss, or donor explanation changes to report a refusal. 4. For this Forensic Drug Testing Specimen Validity file, read hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision against an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff and write the one fact that would move to report a refusal for oral-fluid implementation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold on this Forensic Drug Testing / Specimen Validity packet (hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after an oral-fluid device the lab has not validated for this cutoff). If hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision cannot force a Forensic Drug Testing label under Specimen Validity, stop. Do not invent missing evidence an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive does not have.