Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (f47a39)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
After add-backs that are just delayed opex, carve-out stranded-cost model is what working-capital true-up analyst can touch in a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate. M&A Due Diligence will live with Proceed versus Reprice on this Legal, IP, and Regulatory file.
Decision
Working-capital true-up analyst in a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using carve-out stranded-cost model after add-backs that are just delayed opex.
Hypotheses to test
- Carve-out stranded-cost model reads as Proceed once add-backs that are just delayed opex is lined up to the same M&A Due Diligence population.
- Carve-out stranded-cost model is closer to Reprice after add-backs that are just delayed opex; Proceed would over-claim this Legal, IP, and Regulatory extract.
- Walk is still live in carve-out stranded-cost model for working-capital true-up analyst in a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate.
- Carve-out stranded-cost model is missing the fact working-capital true-up analyst needs after add-backs that are just delayed opex; stop this M&A Due Diligence close.
Analysis required
- Test whether add-backs that are just delayed opex is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away.
- Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in carve-out stranded-cost model.
- Map reps, earnout mechanics, and integration risk a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate would inherit.
- For this M&A Due Diligence Legal, IP, and Regulatory file, read carve-out stranded-cost model against add-backs that are just delayed opex and write the one fact that would move a top customer is actually sticky for working-capital true-up analyst.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / Legal, IP, and Regulatory packet (carve-out stranded-cost model after add-backs that are just delayed opex). The follow-on Legal, IP, and Regulatory action is what working-capital true-up analyst does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Command returns
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight (8b64f0)
- Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (73dfdd)
- Assess whether working capital should be a walk-away (3b16de)
- Assess whether earnings quality supports the bid price (6b3f52)
- Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (22d2c0)
Explore related decision areas
- Determine professional Liability Claims-Made Tail Exposure AI DecisionInsurance Underwriting
- Assess whether the pattern is timing, error, or scheme (b09d96)Forensic Accounting
- Assess whether claimed differentiators would survive a fact check (5cdef6)Government RFP
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

