Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (57fa3d)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
The desk packet is carve-out stranded-cost model after a Phase II that found groundwater impact. IP diligence counsel's financial counterpart in a public acquirer facing HSR and sector regulators has to name Proceed or Reprice for this M&A Due Diligence Legal, IP, and Regulatory file.
Decision
IP diligence counsel's financial counterpart in a public acquirer facing HSR and sector regulators must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using carve-out stranded-cost model after a Phase II that found groundwater impact.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Proceed now; carve-out stranded-cost model already has the discriminator after a Phase II that found groundwater impact.
- Keep Reprice in force until carve-out stranded-cost model is completed after a Phase II that found groundwater impact for IP diligence counsel's financial counterpart.
- Treat carve-out stranded-cost model as Walk because both readings appear after a Phase II that found groundwater impact.
- Refuse a M&A Due Diligence close: IP diligence counsel's financial counterpart does not have the page a top customer is actually sticky turns on in carve-out stranded-cost model.
Analysis required
- Test whether a Phase II that found groundwater impact is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away.
- Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in carve-out stranded-cost model.
- Map reps, earnout mechanics, and integration risk a public acquirer facing HSR and sector regulators would inherit.
- For this M&A Due Diligence Legal, IP, and Regulatory file, read carve-out stranded-cost model against a Phase II that found groundwater impact and write the one fact that would move a top customer is actually sticky for IP diligence counsel's financial counterpart.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / Legal, IP, and Regulatory packet (carve-out stranded-cost model after a Phase II that found groundwater impact). The follow-on Legal, IP, and Regulatory action is what IP diligence counsel's financial counterpart does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight (666df6)
- Assess whether to re-trade, restructure, or drop (60a1c4)
- Assess whether working capital should be a walk-away (a65396)
- Assess whether related-party sales should be backed out of valuation (24518e)
- Assess whether earnings quality supports the bid price (c29b75)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether key personnel substitutions will trigger evaluation riskGovernment RFP
- Assess whether inventory exists or is only on paper (49997f)Forensic Accounting
- Assess whether cash ever economically changed hands (9c4561)Forensic Accounting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

