Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (05f8ca)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Customer-contract risk reviewer in a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate has one working extract — management-team retention and key-person map — after add-backs that are just delayed opex. If management-team retention and key-person map cannot support a top customer is actually sticky, the honest M&A Due Diligence output is hold.
Decision
Customer-contract risk reviewer in a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using management-team retention and key-person map after add-backs that are just delayed opex.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Proceed now; management-team retention and key-person map already has the discriminator after add-backs that are just delayed opex.
- Keep Reprice in force until management-team retention and key-person map is completed after add-backs that are just delayed opex for customer-contract risk reviewer.
- Treat management-team retention and key-person map as Walk because both readings appear after add-backs that are just delayed opex.
- Refuse a M&A Due Diligence close: customer-contract risk reviewer does not have the page a top customer is actually sticky turns on in management-team retention and key-person map.
Analysis required
- Map reps, earnout mechanics, and integration risk a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate would inherit.
- Tie quality-of-earnings, working-capital, and contingent items in management-team retention and key-person map to a top customer is actually sticky.
- Name the document customer-contract risk reviewer still needs before signing.
- For this M&A Due Diligence Separation and Integration file, read management-team retention and key-person map against add-backs that are just delayed opex and write the one fact that would move a top customer is actually sticky for customer-contract risk reviewer.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / Separation and Integration packet (management-team retention and key-person map after add-backs that are just delayed opex). The follow-on Separation and Integration action is what customer-contract risk reviewer does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether the carve-out is operable on day one (2afb9b)
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight (07854b)
- Assess whether earnings quality supports the bid price (602920)
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight (93e4d5)
- Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (4cb070)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether the bid is compliant enough to survive a responsiveness checkGovernment RFP
- Assess whether to non-renew a deteriorating book segment after a brokerInsurance Underwriting
- Assess whether telematics improvements offset driver quality (e26189)Insurance Underwriting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

