Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (cb8f0d)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
A top customer is actually sticky sits with commercial-diligence partner because a contractor who actually wrote the core code hit a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate. Evidence is QoE add-backs the seller marked 'normalized'; write the M&A Due Diligence People and Contracts option that extract can carry.
Decision
Commercial-diligence partner in a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using QoE add-backs the seller marked 'normalized' after a contractor who actually wrote the core code.
Hypotheses to test
- Commercial-diligence partner can defend Proceed from QoE add-backs the seller marked 'normalized' after a contractor who actually wrote the core code in a M&A Due Diligence challenge.
- Commercial-diligence partner cannot defend Proceed from QoE add-backs the seller marked 'normalized'; Reprice is what the extract actually supports after a contractor who actually wrote the core code.
- A contractor who actually wrote the core code never reached the population in QoE add-backs the seller marked 'normalized' — reopen intake, do not close a top customer is actually sticky.
- Two facts in QoE add-backs the seller marked 'normalized' after a contractor who actually wrote the core code conflict for commercial-diligence partner; hold this People and Contracts file.
Analysis required
- Test whether a contractor who actually wrote the core code is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away.
- Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in QoE add-backs the seller marked 'normalized'.
- Map reps, earnout mechanics, and integration risk a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate would inherit.
- For this M&A Due Diligence People and Contracts file, read QoE add-backs the seller marked 'normalized' against a contractor who actually wrote the core code and write the one fact that would move a top customer is actually sticky for commercial-diligence partner.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / People and Contracts packet (QoE add-backs the seller marked 'normalized' after a contractor who actually wrote the core code). The follow-on People and Contracts action is what commercial-diligence partner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether earnings quality supports the bid price (d79852)
- Whether earnings quality supports the bid price from carve-out stranded-cost
- Assess whether environmental liability is capped or open-ended (5d319f)
- Whether to re-trade, restructure, or drop from regulatory-approval
- Assess whether management can run this without the founder (8dff17)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether cyber controls claimed are actually in force after a productInsurance Underwriting
- Assess whether the pattern is timing, error, or scheme (c93893)Forensic Accounting
- Assess whether the pattern is timing, error, or scheme from manualForensic Accounting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

