Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (f622f7)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
A top customer is actually sticky sits with working-capital true-up analyst because add-backs that are just delayed opex hit a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate. Evidence is working-capital peg versus seasonal reality; write the M&A Due Diligence Legal, IP, and Regulatory option that extract can carry.
Decision
Working-capital true-up analyst in a strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after add-backs that are just delayed opex.
Hypotheses to test
- The population in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality is the one add-backs that are just delayed opex named, so Proceed follows for this Legal, IP, and Regulatory file.
- The population in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality is adjacent only to add-backs that are just delayed opex; Reprice is the honest M&A Due Diligence call.
- A strategic buyer looking at a carve-out from a conglomerate already contained add-backs that are just delayed opex before working-capital peg versus seasonal reality arrived; no new Legal, IP, and Regulatory path.
- Provenance on working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after add-backs that are just delayed opex is broken; do not pick Proceed or Reprice yet.
Analysis required
- Name the document working-capital true-up analyst still needs before signing.
- Test whether add-backs that are just delayed opex is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away.
- Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality.
- For this M&A Due Diligence Legal, IP, and Regulatory file, read working-capital peg versus seasonal reality against add-backs that are just delayed opex and write the one fact that would move a top customer is actually sticky for working-capital true-up analyst.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / Legal, IP, and Regulatory packet (working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after add-backs that are just delayed opex). If working-capital peg versus seasonal reality cannot force a M&A Due Diligence label under Legal, IP, and Regulatory, stop. If working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after add-backs that are just delayed opex cannot support Proceed versus Reprice on this M&A Due Diligence Legal, IP, and Regulatory close, working-capital true-up analyst must do not proceed, reprice, or walk on a quality-of-earnings fact the packet does not carry.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether IP is owned or merely licensed (9fde2f)
- Assess whether to re-trade, restructure, or drop (db8be3)
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight from IP
- Assess whether environmental liability is capped or open-ended (cc8c4f)
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight (1da997)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether a modification is in-scope or a new procurement (ed4550)Government RFP
- Assess whether a referral to counsel is warranted (2a061c)Forensic Accounting
- Assess whether cyber controls claimed are actually in force (d6abc3)Insurance Underwriting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

