Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (0063f3)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
After a Phase II that found groundwater impact, working-capital peg versus seasonal reality is what integration-risk PMO can touch in a roll-up of three regional service companies. M&A Due Diligence will live with Proceed versus Reprice on this Legal, IP, and Regulatory file.
Decision
Integration-risk PMO in a roll-up of three regional service companies must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after a Phase II that found groundwater impact.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Proceed now; working-capital peg versus seasonal reality already has the discriminator after a Phase II that found groundwater impact.
- Keep Reprice in force until working-capital peg versus seasonal reality is completed after a Phase II that found groundwater impact for integration-risk PMO.
- Treat working-capital peg versus seasonal reality as Walk because both readings appear after a Phase II that found groundwater impact.
- Refuse a M&A Due Diligence close: integration-risk PMO does not have the page a top customer is actually sticky turns on in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality.
Analysis required
- Name the document integration-risk PMO still needs before signing.
- Test whether a Phase II that found groundwater impact is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away.
- Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality.
- For this M&A Due Diligence Legal, IP, and Regulatory file, read working-capital peg versus seasonal reality against a Phase II that found groundwater impact and write the one fact that would move a top customer is actually sticky for integration-risk PMO.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / Legal, IP, and Regulatory packet (working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after a Phase II that found groundwater impact). If working-capital peg versus seasonal reality cannot force a M&A Due Diligence label under Legal, IP, and Regulatory, stop. If working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after a Phase II that found groundwater impact cannot support Proceed versus Reprice on this M&A Due Diligence Legal, IP, and Regulatory close, integration-risk PMO must do not proceed, reprice, or walk on a quality-of-earnings fact the packet does not carry.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether integration costs were sandbagged in the CIM (d892b5)
- Assess whether the carve-out is operable on day one (32171d)
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight (5cb0e3)
- Assess whether management can run this without the founder (cf0ff6)
- Assess whether the carve-out is operable on day one (2222bf)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

