Assess whether a trial site should be referred (ac8665)

Situation

A bank in a fair-lending comparative-file exam cannot treat an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control as color commentary on purchase-request split just under the SAT. BSA/AML federal case analyst must close a trial site should be referred from that extract under US Federal / M&A Regulatory Due Diligence.

Decision

BSA/AML federal case analyst in a bank in a fair-lending comparative-file exam must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using purchase-request split just under the SAT after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control.

Hypotheses to test

• BSA/AML federal case analyst can defend Pursue from purchase-request split just under the SAT after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control in a US Federal challenge.
• BSA/AML federal case analyst cannot defend Pursue from purchase-request split just under the SAT; Pursue with conditions is what the extract actually supports after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control.
• An OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control never reached the population in purchase-request split just under the SAT — reopen intake, do not close a trial site should be referred.
• Two facts in purchase-request split just under the SAT after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control conflict for BSA/AML federal case analyst; hold this M&A Regulatory Due Diligence file.

Analysis required

• Name the evaluation right BSA/AML federal case analyst would forfeit by rushing.
• Normalize pricing and CPARS/QASP evidence that actually supports a trial site should be referred.
• Compare PTW and compliance gates in purchase-request split just under the SAT to a pursue / partner / no-bid split.
• For this US Federal M&A Regulatory Due Diligence file, read purchase-request split just under the SAT against an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control and write the one fact that would move a trial site should be referred for BSA/AML federal case analyst.

Recommendation

Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this US Federal / M&A Regulatory Due Diligence packet (purchase-request split just under the SAT after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control). Lead with the US Federal option purchase-request split just under the SAT can support after an OCC request for model validation of a fair-lending control, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for BSA/AML federal case analyst in a bank in a fair-lending comparative-file exam.