Assess whether unpriced actions should be stopped (f3e7ca)

SITUATION In a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract, repair-history file that will not tie to cost is the evidence after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x. Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst has to pick Fund and move materiel or Cannibalize or substitute for this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence close using repair-history file that will not tie to cost.

DECISION Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using repair-history file that will not tie to cost after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Repair-history file that will not tie to cost reads as Fund and move materiel once a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x is lined up to the same Defense Sustainment population. 2. Repair-history file that will not tie to cost is closer to Cannibalize or substitute after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x; Fund and move materiel would over-claim this Depot Procurement Intelligence extract. 3. Defer a cycle is still live in repair-history file that will not tie to cost for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract. 4. Repair-history file that will not tie to cost is missing the fact obsolescence and DMSMS analyst needs after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x; stop this Defense Sustainment close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 2. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in repair-history file that will not tie to cost. 3. Quantify mission impact if unpriced actions should be stopped is deferred one cycle in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read repair-history file that will not tie to cost against a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x and write the one fact that would move unpriced actions should be stopped for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst.

RECOMMENDATION Treat this reading of repair-history file that will not tie to cost as the gate for unpriced actions should be stopped: Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count.. If repair-history file that will not tie to cost after a repair cost that exceeds replacement by 3x confirms that reading, obsolescence and DMSMS analyst takes Fund and move materiel in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract. If repair-history file that will not tie to cost contradicts it, take Cannibalize or substitute.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on unpriced actions should be stopped, then the evidence in repair-history file that will not tie to cost, then the action for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst - Hypothesis scorecard against repair-history file that will not tie to cost: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Fund and move materiel, Cannibalize or substitute, Defer a cycle and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract