Assess whether unpriced actions should be stopped (81edca)

SITUATION Scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN arrived with a condemnation cluster after a process change for repair-vs-buy decision support lead. That is a Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence decision on unpriced actions should be stopped in an engineering support activity reviewing alternate sources.

DECISION Repair-vs-buy decision support lead in an engineering support activity reviewing alternate sources must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN after a condemnation cluster after a process change.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Repair-vs-buy decision support lead can defend Fund and move materiel from scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN after a condemnation cluster after a process change in a Defense Sustainment challenge. 2. Repair-vs-buy decision support lead cannot defend Fund and move materiel from scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN; Cannibalize or substitute is what the extract actually supports after a condemnation cluster after a process change. 3. A condemnation cluster after a process change never reached the population in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN — reopen intake, do not close unpriced actions should be stopped. 4. Two facts in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN after a condemnation cluster after a process change conflict for repair-vs-buy decision support lead; hold this Depot Procurement Intelligence file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN. 2. Quantify mission impact if unpriced actions should be stopped is deferred one cycle in an engineering support activity reviewing alternate sources. 3. Reconcile depot demand in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN to fleet readiness and NSN coverage after a condemnation cluster after a process change. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN against a condemnation cluster after a process change and write the one fact that would move unpriced actions should be stopped for repair-vs-buy decision support lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN after a condemnation cluster after a process change). The follow-on Depot Procurement Intelligence action is what repair-vs-buy decision support lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on unpriced actions should be stopped, then the evidence in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN, then the action for repair-vs-buy decision support lead - Hypothesis scorecard against scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN: supported / rejected / untestable - Regulatory or exam hook Depot Procurement Intelligence would cite - Depot Procurement Intelligence finding in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN that a second reviewer can re-perform