Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (97ae5b)

SITUATION After a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice, reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is what vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner can touch in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. AI Governance Layer will live with Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this Audit and Vendor Terms file.

DECISION Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner can defend Policy or governance breach from reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice in a AI Governance Layer challenge. 2. Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner cannot defend Policy or governance breach from reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. 3. A vendor that changed subprocessors without notice never reached the population in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality — reopen intake, do not close vendor terms allow customer. 4. Two facts in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice conflict for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner; hold this Audit and Vendor Terms file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 2. Score whether the agent action in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 3. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). If reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Audit and Vendor Terms, stop. If reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms close, vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.