Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (3efde5)

SITUATION Decision-audit designer is responsible for vendor terms allow customer in a company whose agents can send email without a gate, using agent permissioning that allows external side effects as the only working extract. A scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' is what reset the timeline for this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file.

DECISION Decision-audit designer in a company whose agents can send email without a gate must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using agent permissioning that allows external side effects after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Decision-audit designer can defend Policy or governance breach from agent permissioning that allows external side effects after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' in a AI Governance Layer challenge. 2. Decision-audit designer cannot defend Policy or governance breach from agent permissioning that allows external side effects; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'. 3. A scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' never reached the population in agent permissioning that allows external side effects — reopen intake, do not close vendor terms allow customer. 4. Two facts in agent permissioning that allows external side effects after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' conflict for decision-audit designer; hold this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let vendor terms allow customer proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in agent permissioning that allows external side effects was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read agent permissioning that allows external side effects against a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for decision-audit designer.

RECOMMENDATION Decision-audit designer owns vendor terms allow customer on agent permissioning that allows external side effects in a company whose agents can send email without a gate. After a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable', choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using only what this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability packet proves. If agent permissioning that allows external side effects is silent on the discriminator after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable', decision-audit designer must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact rather than reuse a label from another Lifecycle and Accountability packet.