Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (e65128)

SITUATION A company whose agents can send email without a gate cannot treat a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted as incidental context on committee charter that does not define escalation. Decision-audit designer must close vendor terms allow customer from that extract under AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability.

DECISION Decision-audit designer in a company whose agents can send email without a gate must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using committee charter that does not define escalation after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; committee charter that does not define escalation already has the discriminator after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted. 2. Keep Model defect in force until committee charter that does not define escalation is completed after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted for decision-audit designer. 3. Treat committee charter that does not define escalation as Dual failure because both readings appear after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: decision-audit designer does not have the decision vendor terms allow customer turns on in committee charter that does not define escalation.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in committee charter that does not define escalation was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a company whose agents can send email without a gate. 3. Map the control-plane score in committee charter that does not define escalation to the policy gate decision-audit designer can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read committee charter that does not define escalation against a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for decision-audit designer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (committee charter that does not define escalation after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option committee charter that does not define escalation can support after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for decision-audit designer in a company whose agents can send email without a gate.