Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (140147)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
In a cross-border deal with earnout-heavy structure, customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses is the evidence after a customer who just sent a non-renewal. Working-capital true-up analyst has to pick Proceed or Reprice for this M&A Due Diligence Separation and Integration close using customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses.
Decision
Working-capital true-up analyst in a cross-border deal with earnout-heavy structure must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses after a customer who just sent a non-renewal.
Hypotheses to test
- The population in customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses is the one a customer who just sent a non-renewal named, so Proceed follows for this Separation and Integration file.
- The population in customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses is adjacent only to a customer who just sent a non-renewal; Reprice is the honest M&A Due Diligence call.
- A cross-border deal with earnout-heavy structure already contained a customer who just sent a non-renewal before customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses arrived; no new Separation and Integration path.
- Provenance on customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses after a customer who just sent a non-renewal is broken; do not pick Proceed or Reprice yet.
Analysis required
- Tie quality-of-earnings, working-capital, and contingent items in customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses to a top customer is actually sticky.
- Name the document working-capital true-up analyst still needs before signing.
- Test whether a customer who just sent a non-renewal is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away.
- For this M&A Due Diligence Separation and Integration file, read customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses against a customer who just sent a non-renewal and write the one fact that would move a top customer is actually sticky for working-capital true-up analyst.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / Separation and Integration packet (customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses after a customer who just sent a non-renewal). The follow-on Separation and Integration action is what working-capital true-up analyst does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether regulatory approval is a timing risk or a deal risk (09edc0)
- Assess whether management can run this without the founder (e984ae)
- Assess whether environmental liability is capped or open-ended (62c5d9)
- Assess whether related-party sales should be backed out of valuation (4281e1)
- Assess whether regulatory approval is a timing risk or a deal risk (694a53)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (a4b856)Government RFP
- Assess whether the audit committee must be briefed this week (0f27ab)Forensic Accounting
- Assess whether a referral to counsel is warranted (20f673)Forensic Accounting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

