Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (6a73cb)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
The desk packet is customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses after a peg set at a seasonal high. Working-capital true-up analyst in a family-office reviewing a manufacturing target has to name Proceed or Reprice for this M&A Due Diligence People and Contracts file.
Decision
Working-capital true-up analyst in a family-office reviewing a manufacturing target must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses after a peg set at a seasonal high.
Hypotheses to test
- Customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses reads as Proceed once a peg set at a seasonal high is lined up to the same M&A Due Diligence population.
- Customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses is closer to Reprice after a peg set at a seasonal high; Proceed would over-claim this People and Contracts extract.
- Walk is still live in customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses for working-capital true-up analyst in a family-office reviewing a manufacturing target.
- Customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses is missing the fact working-capital true-up analyst needs after a peg set at a seasonal high; stop this M&A Due Diligence close.
Analysis required
- Name the document working-capital true-up analyst still needs before signing.
- Test whether a peg set at a seasonal high is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away.
- Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses.
- For this M&A Due Diligence People and Contracts file, read customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses against a peg set at a seasonal high and write the one fact that would move a top customer is actually sticky for working-capital true-up analyst.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / People and Contracts packet (customer concentration and termination-for-convenience clauses after a peg set at a seasonal high). The follow-on People and Contracts action is what working-capital true-up analyst does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether environmental liability is capped or open-ended (4b9415)
- Assess whether integration costs were sandbagged in the CIM (ef0ba6)
- Assess whether IP is owned or merely licensed (5fc0bd)
- Assess whether working capital should be a walk-away (6ad3c4)
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight (c23f47)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether cyber controls claimed are actually in force from umbrellaInsurance Underwriting
- Whether CAT pricing is defensible given SOV quality from D&O claims-madeInsurance Underwriting
- Assess whether a protest is rational after debrief (1ac220)Government RFP
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

