Assess whether the control plane actually controls production traffic (497b10)

SITUATION Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality arrived with a committee that has not met since the last incident for AI committee secretariat. That is a AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability decision on the control plane actually in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a committee that has not met since the last incident.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. AI committee secretariat can defend Policy or governance breach from reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a committee that has not met since the last incident in a AI Governance Layer challenge. 2. AI committee secretariat cannot defend Policy or governance breach from reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after a committee that has not met since the last incident. 3. A committee that has not met since the last incident never reached the population in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality — reopen intake, do not close the control plane actually. 4. Two facts in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a committee that has not met since the last incident conflict for AI committee secretariat; hold this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. 2. Map the control-plane score in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let the control plane actually proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against a committee that has not met since the last incident and write the one fact that would move the control plane actually for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a committee that has not met since the last incident). If reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Lifecycle and Accountability, stop. If reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a committee that has not met since the last incident cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability close, AI committee secretariat must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.