Assess whether the committee can overrule a business unit (f60f9c)

SITUATION A publisher needing provenance on generated copy cannot treat a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted as incidental context on enterprise AI risk register with missing owners. AI committee secretariat must close the committee can overrule from that extract under AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using enterprise AI risk register with missing owners after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; enterprise AI risk register with missing owners already has the discriminator after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted. 2. Keep Model defect in force until enterprise AI risk register with missing owners is completed after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted for AI committee secretariat. 3. Treat enterprise AI risk register with missing owners as Dual failure because both readings appear after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: AI committee secretariat does not have the decision the committee can overrule turns on in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 2. Score whether the agent action in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 3. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read enterprise AI risk register with missing owners against a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted and write the one fact that would move the committee can overrule for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (enterprise AI risk register with missing owners after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what AI committee secretariat does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on the committee can overrule, then the evidence in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners, then the action for AI committee secretariat - Hypothesis scorecard against enterprise AI risk register with missing owners: supported / rejected / untestable - Regulatory or exam hook Lifecycle and Accountability would cite - Lifecycle and Accountability finding in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners that a second reviewer can re-perform