Assess whether agents must have a human gate for external actions (dd4961)

SITUATION Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor has one working extract — reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality — after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. If reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality cannot support agents must have a human gate, the only defensible AI Governance Layer output is hold.

DECISION Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is noise around an already-controlled Control Plane and Scoring process in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor, given reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality. 2. A vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is the event in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality that forces Policy or governance breach for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner under AI Governance Layer. 3. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality shows a one-file miss after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice, not a Control Plane and Scoring program failure. 4. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality cannot decide agents must have a human gate yet after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice; hold is the only AI Governance Layer close an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor. 2. Map the control-plane score in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality to the policy gate vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let agents must have a human gate proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move agents must have a human gate for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). The follow-on Control Plane and Scoring action is what vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.