Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (b772ec)

SITUATION In a publisher needing provenance on generated copy, multi-model disagreement log on production cases is the evidence after an agent that refunded customers above its limit. AI committee secretariat has to pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability close using multi-model disagreement log on production cases.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using multi-model disagreement log on production cases after an agent that refunded customers above its limit.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; multi-model disagreement log on production cases already has the discriminator after an agent that refunded customers above its limit. 2. Keep Model defect in force until multi-model disagreement log on production cases is completed after an agent that refunded customers above its limit for AI committee secretariat. 3. Treat multi-model disagreement log on production cases as Dual failure because both readings appear after an agent that refunded customers above its limit. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: AI committee secretariat does not have the decision procurement should fail a turns on in multi-model disagreement log on production cases.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in multi-model disagreement log on production cases to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let procurement should fail a proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether an agent that refunded customers above its limit changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read multi-model disagreement log on production cases against an agent that refunded customers above its limit and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (multi-model disagreement log on production cases after an agent that refunded customers above its limit). If multi-model disagreement log on production cases cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Lifecycle and Accountability, stop. If multi-model disagreement log on production cases after an agent that refunded customers above its limit cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability close, AI committee secretariat must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.