Assess whether the control plane actually controls production traffic (52e5c6)

SITUATION The control plane actually sits with multi-model reconciliation lead because a batch job still calling a retired endpoint hit a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. Evidence is decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step; write the AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability option that extract can carry.

DECISION Multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step already has the discriminator after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint. 2. Keep Model defect in force until decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step is completed after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint for multi-model reconciliation lead. 3. Treat decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step as Dual failure because both readings appear after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: multi-model reconciliation lead does not have the page the control plane actually turns on in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let the control plane actually proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether a batch job still calling a retired endpoint changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step against a batch job still calling a retired endpoint and write the one fact that would move the control plane actually for multi-model reconciliation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint). If decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Lifecycle and Accountability, stop. If decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability close, multi-model reconciliation lead must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.