Assess whether the control plane actually controls production traffic (823de6)

SITUATION Decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step arrived with a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice for multi-model reconciliation lead. That is a AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability decision on the control plane actually in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions.

DECISION Multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is noise around an already-controlled Lifecycle and Accountability process in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions, given decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step. 2. A vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is the event in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step that forces Policy or governance breach for multi-model reconciliation lead under AI Governance Layer. 3. Decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step shows a one-file miss after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice, not a Lifecycle and Accountability program failure. 4. Decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step cannot decide the control plane actually yet after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice; hold is the only AI Governance Layer close a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. 2. Map the control-plane score in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step to the policy gate multi-model reconciliation lead can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let the control plane actually proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move the control plane actually for multi-model reconciliation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what multi-model reconciliation lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.