Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (bf9012)

Situation

A shadow system must sits with board AI liaison because a business unit that already went live without a risk tier hit a city using a hiring-screen algorithm. Evidence is EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet; write the AI Governance Bias and Training Data option that extract can carry.

Decision

Board AI liaison in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier.

Hypotheses to test

• Board AI liaison can defend Policy or governance breach from EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier in a AI Governance challenge.
• Board AI liaison cannot defend Policy or governance breach from EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier.
• A business unit that already went live without a risk tier never reached the population in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet — reopen intake, do not close a shadow system must.
• Two facts in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier conflict for board AI liaison; hold this Bias and Training Data file.

Analysis required

• Walk the model input/output path recorded in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
• Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate board AI liaison can actually point to.
• Walk the model input/output path recorded in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
• For this AI Governance Bias and Training Data file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against a business unit that already went live without a risk tier and write the one fact that would move a shadow system must for board AI liaison.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Bias and Training Data packet (EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier). The follow-on Bias and Training Data action is what board AI liaison does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

Command returns

• Bottom-line AI Governance option on a shadow system must, then the evidence in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet, then the action for board AI liaison
• Hypothesis scorecard against EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet: supported / rejected / untestable
• Missing page in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a business unit that already went live without a risk tier, if any
• Regulatory or exam hook Bias and Training Data would cite