Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (8fef69)

Situation

The desk packet is teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit. CMMC implementation lead in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft has to name Past performance will score or Be deemed not relevant for this Government RFP Protest and Modifications file.

Decision

CMMC implementation lead in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit.

Hypotheses to test

• The population in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes is the one a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit named, so Past performance will score follows for this Protest and Modifications file.
• The population in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes is adjacent only to a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit; Be deemed not relevant is the honest Government RFP call.
• A joint venture with an uneven workshare draft already contained a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit before teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes arrived; no new Protest and Modifications path.
• Provenance on teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit is broken; do not pick Past performance will score or Be deemed not relevant yet.

Analysis required

• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score.
• Score competitive posture if CMMC implementation lead pursues, partners, or no-bids.
• For this Government RFP Protest and Modifications file, read teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes against a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for CMMC implementation lead.

Recommendation

Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Protest and Modifications packet (teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit). If teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes cannot force a Government RFP label under Protest and Modifications, stop. If teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit cannot support Past performance will score versus Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP Protest and Modifications close, CMMC implementation lead must identify the Section L/M or evaluation criterion that remains unproven rather than filling the gap.