Assess whether the site should be suspended from collections (f8838d)

SITUATION After a donor claiming the seal was already broken, hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision is what custody-and-control specialist can touch in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive. Forensic Drug Testing will live with Accept the result versus Reject on custody on this Collection and Custody file.

DECISION Custody-and-control specialist in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive must choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold using hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after a donor claiming the seal was already broken.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A donor claiming the seal was already broken is noise around an already-controlled Collection and Custody process in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive, given hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision. 2. A donor claiming the seal was already broken is the event in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision that forces Accept the result for custody-and-control specialist under Forensic Drug Testing. 3. Hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision shows a one-file miss after a donor claiming the seal was already broken, not a Collection and Custody program failure. 4. Hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision cannot decide the site should be suspended yet after a donor claiming the seal was already broken; hold is the only Forensic Drug Testing close an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the step custody-and-control specialist cannot reconstruct from hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision. 2. Test whether a broken seal, timing miss, or donor explanation changes the site should be suspended. 3. Confirm the kit ID in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision matches the collection log. 4. For this Forensic Drug Testing Collection and Custody file, read hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision against a donor claiming the seal was already broken and write the one fact that would move the site should be suspended for custody-and-control specialist.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Accept the result / Reject on custody / Recollect / Hold on this Forensic Drug Testing / Collection and Custody packet (hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision after a donor claiming the seal was already broken). The follow-on Collection and Custody action is what custody-and-control specialist does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Forensic Drug Testing option on the site should be suspended, then the evidence in hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision, then the action for custody-and-control specialist - Hypothesis scorecard against hair-test admissibility file for a non-DOT decision: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for custody-and-control specialist in an MRO reviewing a prescription-explained positive - What changes the site should be suspended if a donor claiming the seal was already broken is later withdrawn