Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (c6d7f0)

SITUATION Enterprise AI control-plane owner is responsible for vendor terms allow customer in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights, using deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job as the only working extract. A batch job still calling a retired endpoint is what reset the timeline for this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file.

DECISION Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job already has the discriminator after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint. 2. Keep Model defect in force until deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job is completed after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint for enterprise AI control-plane owner. 3. Treat deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job as Dual failure because both readings appear after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: enterprise AI control-plane owner does not have the decision vendor terms allow customer turns on in deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let vendor terms allow customer proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether a batch job still calling a retired endpoint changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job against a batch job still calling a retired endpoint and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for enterprise AI control-plane owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what enterprise AI control-plane owner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on vendor terms allow customer, then the evidence in deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job, then the action for enterprise AI control-plane owner - Hypothesis scorecard against deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Audit and Vendor Terms would cite