Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (0a436d)

SITUATION Enterprise AI risk register with missing owners arrived with two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file for enterprise AI control-plane owner. That is a AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms decision on vendor terms allow customer in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights.

DECISION Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using enterprise AI risk register with missing owners after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file is noise around an already-controlled Audit and Vendor Terms process in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights, given enterprise AI risk register with missing owners. 2. Two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file is the event in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners that forces Policy or governance breach for enterprise AI control-plane owner under AI Governance Layer. 3. Enterprise AI risk register with missing owners shows a one-file miss after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file, not a Audit and Vendor Terms program failure. 4. Enterprise AI risk register with missing owners cannot decide vendor terms allow customer yet after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file; hold is the only AI Governance Layer close a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights. 3. Map the control-plane score in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners to the policy gate enterprise AI control-plane owner can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read enterprise AI risk register with missing owners against two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for enterprise AI control-plane owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (enterprise AI risk register with missing owners after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what enterprise AI control-plane owner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.