Assess whether related-party sales should be backed out of valuation (000f21)
August 31, 2026
SITUATION A peg set at a seasonal high put environmental known-condition schedule in front of carve-out separation lead in a PE platform evaluating a founder-led SaaS add-on. This M&A Due Diligence / Separation and Integration close is related-party sales should be from environmental known-condition schedule, and the live options are Proceed, Reprice, Walk.
DECISION Carve-out separation lead in a PE platform evaluating a founder-led SaaS add-on must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using environmental known-condition schedule after a peg set at a seasonal high.
HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Proceed now; environmental known-condition schedule already has the discriminator after a peg set at a seasonal high. 2. Keep Reprice in force until environmental known-condition schedule is completed after a peg set at a seasonal high for carve-out separation lead. 3. Treat environmental known-condition schedule as Walk because both readings appear after a peg set at a seasonal high. 4. Refuse a M&A Due Diligence close: carve-out separation lead does not have the decision related-party sales should be turns on in environmental known-condition schedule.
ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in environmental known-condition schedule. 2. Map reps, earnout mechanics, and integration risk a PE platform evaluating a founder-led SaaS add-on would inherit. 3. Tie quality-of-earnings, working-capital, and contingent items in environmental known-condition schedule to related-party sales should be. 4. For this M&A Due Diligence Separation and Integration file, read environmental known-condition schedule against a peg set at a seasonal high and write the one fact that would move related-party sales should be for carve-out separation lead.
RECOMMENDATION Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / Separation and Integration packet (environmental known-condition schedule after a peg set at a seasonal high). The follow-on Separation and Integration action is what carve-out separation lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line M&A Due Diligence option on related-party sales should be, then the evidence in environmental known-condition schedule, then the action for carve-out separation lead - Hypothesis scorecard against environmental known-condition schedule: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Proceed, Reprice, Walk and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for carve-out separation lead in a PE platform evaluating a founder-led SaaS add-on
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether to re-trade, restructure, or drop (18dba5)
- Assess whether the carve-out is operable on day one (6aff1e)
- Assess whether related-party sales should be backed out of valuation (dff96a)
- Assess whether environmental liability is capped or open-ended (42b693)
- Assess whether earnings quality supports the bid price (fb2acf)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether cash ever economically changed hands from bill-and-holdForensic Accounting
- Assess whether claimed differentiators would survive a fact check (b3e6ba)Government RFP
- Assess whether to quote, refer, or decline (d81a56)Insurance Underwriting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

