Assess whether deprecation of a legacy scorecard creates a governance gap
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
The desk packet is EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region. EU AI Act implementation manager in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor has to name Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file.
Decision
EU AI Act implementation manager in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Policy or governance breach now; EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet already has the discriminator after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.
- Keep Model defect in force until EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is completed after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region for EU AI Act implementation manager.
- Treat EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet as Dual failure because both readings appear after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.
- Refuse a AI Governance close: EU AI Act implementation manager does not have the page deprecation of a legacy turns on in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.
Analysis required
- Reproduce the incident row in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and say whether it ever touched production data.
- Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.
- Reproduce the incident row in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and say whether it ever touched production data.
- For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region and write the one fact that would move deprecation of a legacy for EU AI Act implementation manager.
Recommendation
Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit packet (EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region). The follow-on Inventory and Regulatory Fit action is what EU AI Act implementation manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Command returns
- Bottom-line AI Governance option on deprecation of a legacy, then the evidence in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet, then the action for EU AI Act implementation manager
- Hypothesis scorecard against EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet: supported / rejected / untestable
- Owner and next date for EU AI Act implementation manager in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor
- What changes deprecation of a legacy if a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region is later withdrawn
Related resources
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

