Assess whether the vendor can be used in a regulated process (c0e357)

SITUATION A drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal put EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet in front of board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service. This AI Governance / Policy and Oversight decision is the vendor can be from EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.

DECISION Board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet reads as Policy or governance breach once a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal is lined up to the same AI Governance population. 2. EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is closer to Model defect after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Policy and Oversight extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet for board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service. 4. EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is missing the fact board AI liaison needs after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal; stop this AI Governance close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the approved-use case to the system the vendor can be would bind. 2. Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal. 3. Map the approved-use case to the system the vendor can be would bind. 4. For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal and write the one fact that would move the vendor can be for board AI liaison.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal). The follow-on Policy and Oversight action is what board AI liaison does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the vendor can be, then the evidence in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet, then the action for board AI liaison - Hypothesis scorecard against EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service