Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (cecfb2)

SITUATION After a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice, output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output is what model-deprecation manager can touch in a company whose agents can send email without a gate. AI Governance Layer will live with Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this Audit and Vendor Terms file.

DECISION Model-deprecation manager in a company whose agents can send email without a gate must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is noise around an already-controlled Audit and Vendor Terms process in a company whose agents can send email without a gate, given output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output. 2. A vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is the event in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output that forces Policy or governance breach for model-deprecation manager under AI Governance Layer. 3. Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output shows a one-file miss after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice, not a Audit and Vendor Terms program failure. 4. Output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output cannot decide vendor terms allow customer yet after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice; hold is the only AI Governance Layer close a company whose agents can send email without a gate can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a company whose agents can send email without a gate. 2. Map the control-plane score in output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output to the policy gate model-deprecation manager can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let vendor terms allow customer proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for model-deprecation manager.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (output-scoring rubric that never fails a high-risk output after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what model-deprecation manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.