Assess whether Section M scoring math was applied consistently (aea83c)

Situation

Past-performance volume owner owns Section M scoring math inside a lab competing a Phase II SBIR with protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors as the only packet. A data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year is what changed the clock for this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file.

Decision

Past-performance volume owner in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.

Hypotheses to test

• The population in protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors is the one a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year named, so Pursue follows for this Compliance and Cyber Requirements file.
• The population in protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors is adjacent only to a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year; Pursue with conditions is the honest Government RFP call.
• A lab competing a Phase II SBIR already contained a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year before protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors arrived; no new Compliance and Cyber Requirements path.
• Provenance on protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year is broken; do not pick Pursue or Pursue with conditions yet.

Analysis required

• Map Section L/M requirements in protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors to evaluator notes after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs Section M scoring math.
• For this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file, read protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors against a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year and write the one fact that would move Section M scoring math for past-performance volume owner.

Recommendation

Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Compliance and Cyber Requirements packet (protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors after a data-rights assertion the customer already rejected last year). If protest-exposure memo on evaluation factors cannot force a Government RFP label under Compliance and Cyber Requirements, stop. Do not invent pages a lab competing a Phase II SBIR does not have.